Canoo, once a promising electric vehicle startup, has officially declared bankruptcy, bringing to light a complex web of investor relationships and controversies that shaped its brief existence in Silicon Valley. The company, which emerged from stealth mode in early 2018, attracted attention for its ambitious vision of “mobility” and futuristic vehicle designs. As the dust settles on its downfall, questions arise about the key players involved, particularly the mysterious investors that backed Canoo.
Former NBA Commissioner David Stern, an early founding investor in Canoo, was instrumental in the company’s formative shark tank days. His connections went way deeper than just the business world. Amongst other things, he had been especially tight with Prince Andrew, fuelling concerns over his alleged connections to the British royalty. There were swirling rumors about Prince Andrew’s involvement with Canoo, that he had acted as an advisor. These new connections have raised questions and raised eyebrows over what’s driving the company’s activities.
Stern’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein throw a wrench into the narrative. In 2008, Epstein was convicted of soliciting prostitution from a minor. He had a trumpeting record of falling out with big name investors. According to news reports, Stern and Epstein did discuss a range of investment opportunities – including embracethecanyon.com Canoo. What really stood out about their discussions was both sides’ obvious enthusiasm for seizing opportunities presented by the booming electric vehicle industry.
Canoo’s initial investors left everyone in the dark on their role when the company went public. Canoo’s unknown financial backers became known after a lawsuit forced their disclosure. The once opaque nature of their support suddenly turned crystal clear. Even with all the outward excitement about the startup, it was deeply challenged from within. His decision to purchase more than half of the company’s future shares raised red flags, creating discord within the original team. This unrest drove away potential allies and investors.
As climate change debates shifted more toward the electric vehicle revolution taking place, Canoo’s pitch began to resonate with investors such as Stern and Epstein. The enthusiasm around the idea of “the future of transportation” helped foster an environment where premature speculation and investment ran rampant. Stern’s pitch to Epstein to join his family office included Canoo and some other ventures that showed how deeply their business interests had become knotted together.
Canoo’s journey is a case study in a new Silicon Valley trend, in which ambitious, secretive startups lured inscrutable investors with shadowy online personas. In this case, the founders’ vision of “mobility” clashed with internal power struggles and external scrutiny, ultimately leading to the company’s collapse.
Leave a Reply