Deel markets itself as a remote-work-compatible HR tech unicorn with more than a billion dollars of annual revenue and profitable operations. It has greatly increased its fight in court against competitor Rippling. In a newly filed amended complaint, Deel has added the accusation that Rippling committed corporate espionage by impersonating Deel’s customers. This accusation escalates the already bitter feud between the two automakers. They are not only our fierce competitors in the HR tech industry.
The third amended complaint adds important information to what we know about the spying allegations. Specifically, it alleges that Rippling’s activities are connected to an employee who has the title of Competitive Intelligence. This new employee’s role hints that Rippling could be keeping a close eye on the competition to focus on getting an edge within the crowded field. The complaint raises serious allegations that point to a dangerous direction the HR tech industry seems to be taking. Companies are more than ever turning to anti-competitive tactics such as buying up each other’s products to stifle competition and get a leg up.
Rippling is Deel’s biggest enemy, and the race between the two has heated up tremendously in recent years. Deel is hit with serious new allegations as U.S. Senator Adam Schiff calls for an investigation of Deel’s misclassification of workers. The U.S. Department of Labor should take a closer look at Deel’s practices in the coming months. This increased scrutiny further complicates the already tense and adversarial relationship between the two companies.
In its amended complaint, Deel states, “To understand Conrad is to understand Rippling,” referencing relationships within the company that may influence its competitive strategies. Deel claims that Conrad has chosen to devote his life’s pursuits to seeking such misguided and petty revenge. This vengeance seeks to punish everyone associated with Andreessen, such as Deel, the startup in which Andreessen owns a 20% stake. These declarations raise the prospect that individual passions are beginning to mix with corporate tactics.
Rippling has denied any liability in the matter and released its own statement addressing the allegations. A spokesperson for the company emphasized their commitment to ethical competition, stating, “Rippling is unwavering in our commitment to fair competition and the highest ethical standards. We expect full compliance as described clearly in our written policies.” This response suggests that Rippling will be contesting Deel’s claims tooth and nail as to why their practices go beyond Rippling.
This legal battle between the two companies sheds light on a bigger, more troubling trend taking place across the HR tech industry. Yet aggressive tactics go further and further into the unethical. As companies compete fiercely to push out their rivals and gain a first mover advantage, allegations of corporate espionage can result in severe reputational ramifications and legal retribution.
Leave a Reply